Web Control

[King Rat]

The British inventor of the INTERNET (no, not Al Gore) fears what will become of the world if the World Wide Web is allowed to continue unfettered. He is calling for a "new science" to study the web and create a new, better, web in which content is "controlled"

Misinformation is damaging society.

What he doesn't disclose is who, exactly, should appoint themselves to decide what content is acceptable but the implication is that the committee of scientists ordained to undertake this enormous study will have that control.

The INTERNET was invented for intellectuals and was never intended to reach the hands of the common goat. Now, it seems, they want it back.

Controlling thought and expression of thought is a central building block of the liberal (lately democrat) agenda. Many times I have said the INTERNET is the liberal agenda's worst enemy because, unlike the media, they don't control it. If liberals are ever to force their elitist nonsense down our throats they MUST do something about the free flow of information over this vast network known as the WWW.

Will YOU vote to put democrats back in power?

[rutrow]

King Rat, we all know that the liberal democrats are dangerous. However, they are working with the republicans hand in hand to bring about the New World Order. It was first mentioned by GW's father during the 1990 Gulf War. Internet II has been being talked about for several years and yes, it will be very controlled. In order to bring in the NWO, they cannot have real information about what they are doing to move through the internet. Their success depends on the public remaining ignorant of what they are doing. This is where the term conspiracy theorist was birthed.

[peasNcarrots]

Just as long as there is free pr0n

[King Rat]

Actually, the earliest mention I have been able to find about NWO was near the end of WWII when FDR discussed plans for a "New World Order" at Yalta with Churchill and Stalin. Ever since the dawn of time some elitists have wanted to rule the world under one umbrella. Thankfully it has always failed.

You are right, though, that both parties are working together to achieve world domination by the elites. At that social level party distinctions don't apply. What is really in our favor, though, is that people who deem themselves more worthy to rule the herd don't typically get along with others like them. Yes, they can agree on the long term goal but when it gets down to the details they start bickering over whose power will be greatest and the tight unity cracks. The EU is a perfect example of that. The European elite agree they should rule Europe but every time they try to dot the i's and cross the t's they start fighting.

What is more dangerous to us now is the constant errosion of our rights as the left uses the courts to subvert the Constitution and take away our freedoms.

Contrary to appearance, I am NOT a republican. I am an independant conservative who just happens to think the current democrat agenda is more dangerous to us than the republican agenda. Besides, the republicans are too dumb and spineless to push their agenda beyond minimal resistance so we have a choice of stalemate and extremism. I'll take a stalemate any day.