Post by King Rat on Nov 21, 2006 7:47:10 GMT -6
Surely everyone has seen or heard of the Micheal Richards (Krammer) meltdown the other night. In case anyone hasn't, he was being heckled at a comedy club and went on a tirade calling the two black hecklers a word that starts with "n" and can only be used by blacks.
Sidenote: Isn't it odd that it is acceptable to say GD on television but not the N word?
Last night Krammer was on Letterman (via satelite) and spent about five minutes apologizing profusely. I heard the clip this morning on Supertalk and he sounded pretty distraught.
No doubt about it - what he did was out of line. I'm not about to defend it. My only interest is in how the media, and society, handles it compared to other instances of foot-in-mouth.
Suppose you were Krammer's advisor. What would you tell him to do? Personally, I think he did the right thing with the apology. It sounded sincere and unscripted. Whether he works again, I guess, will just be up to whether or not people want to give him another chance.
Had Chris Rock said the same thing we would not even be discussing this but, then, Rock is black. Rock, however, could have carried on a tirade like that against any ethnic group and gotten away with it.
Should he take the Dixie Chicks approach and keep making such statements - making them a centerpiece in future shows while claiming freedom of speech?
Should he take the John Kerry approach and say it was a bungled joke and apologize "if anyone misinterpreted his remarks"?
Should he take the Robert Byrd approach and run for the senate?
Sidenote: Isn't it odd that it is acceptable to say GD on television but not the N word?
Last night Krammer was on Letterman (via satelite) and spent about five minutes apologizing profusely. I heard the clip this morning on Supertalk and he sounded pretty distraught.
No doubt about it - what he did was out of line. I'm not about to defend it. My only interest is in how the media, and society, handles it compared to other instances of foot-in-mouth.
Suppose you were Krammer's advisor. What would you tell him to do? Personally, I think he did the right thing with the apology. It sounded sincere and unscripted. Whether he works again, I guess, will just be up to whether or not people want to give him another chance.
Had Chris Rock said the same thing we would not even be discussing this but, then, Rock is black. Rock, however, could have carried on a tirade like that against any ethnic group and gotten away with it.
Should he take the Dixie Chicks approach and keep making such statements - making them a centerpiece in future shows while claiming freedom of speech?
Should he take the John Kerry approach and say it was a bungled joke and apologize "if anyone misinterpreted his remarks"?
Should he take the Robert Byrd approach and run for the senate?